Four scenarios for the crisis

2020-04-17 at 9:24 Timo Löyttyniemi

We have been watching the spread of the coronavirus in amazement and following the massive measures being implemented to counter it. Decision-making has focused on human health, hospital capacity, intensive care and the number of deaths. Public confidence in the projections made by the health authorities has been high, and they have played a key role in decision-making. At the same time, there has been remarkable uncertainty as to what we know and what we don’t. To understand what may happen in the economy and the marketplace, the following four scenarios could prove useful.

Scenario 1: MIRACLE

In the Miracle scenario, the coronavirus will be beaten with a vaccine or it will disappear as a result of natural debilitation in a matter of months. Such a miracle would permit fast economic recovery. Social interaction would be quickly restored and demand for restaurant and travel services would pick up. Getting a vaccine on the market in a short time would be nothing short of a miracle. The Miracle scenario could also materialise if the virus had a natural tendency to become less aggressive or if it were weakened by favourable weather conditions.

The Miracle scenario would mean that the words of President Trump ”One day, it’s like a miracle, it will disappear” (27 Feb 2020) would come true and everything would soon be business as usual. For the economy and markets, it would mean a V-shaped recovery.


If materialised, the Effective Treatment scenario would mean the discovery of a medical cure. It would reduce the need for hospital and intensive care, thereby eliminating one bottleneck in the clinical pathway. While such treatment would not prevent infections, it would protect those infected from the worst complications. There have been speculations in the media that such a treatment could be revolutionary. However, it appears that we do not know enough about potential effective treatments, and some of the information being circulated has been disputed by experts. When talking about a certain treatment, President Trump said that it was “a game changer” (19 March 2020). So far, we have seen nothing of the sort.

Scenario 3: BASELINE

In the Baseline Scenario, the coronavirus would continue to cause a range of disruptions of varying intensity until a vaccine was discovered. It is speculated that a vaccine could be found in about a year. Such quick progress is possible because numerous research teams are engaged in persistent efforts to work out a solution and bring the project to a successful conclusion. Conceivably, a vaccine could be available one year from now, in 2021. Should this happen, it would mean that the coronavirus would remain a threat until then. It could pose a risk locally or globally or appear in bursts or pervasively in its current or some mutated form. Many countries would probably employ the best technology, engage in active testing and monitor the chains of transmission. Despite these best efforts, people would remain cautious and show restraint until a new vaccine was made available. As a result, the economy and equity markets would split into two. Some sectors would benefit from the situation, or at least be able to cope with it, whereas others would face long-term problems. At least the restaurant and travel industries would be not able to transform quickly enough.

The massive support packages put together by states and central banks in March 2020 would be followed by further measures. Socially and economically, the price of maintaining the previous standard of living would be high, if not unsustainable. Hard choices would have to be made throughout the year. Efforts to maintain liquidity would be replaced by risk sharing. The step from sending benefits to collecting taxes would be short. Sovereign debt could be increased through central bank asset purchases, but it would not be possible to postpone taxes for long.

Overall, the Baseline Scenario would mean that the economy and markets would follow a W-shaped curve throughout 2020. Comfort and confidence in the future would be provided by the expectation of an effective vaccine. These expectations would be reflected at least in the stock markets even if an economic recovery were not to materialise at this point.

Scenario 4: DEPRESSION

If the coronavirus continues to beset us and no vaccine is found, we may be in for a prolonged recession. Global impacts combined with cautious consumer behaviour would mean that the world will not be the same again. A lot of things would change for good. People’s behaviour patterns would change, and the economy would adjust. Economic growth would stall and the mood in the stock market would become apprehensive.

New letters to symbolise the development of the economy and markets

The above scenarios are not mutually exclusive, at least not completely. They may overlap or materialise in succession. One day, people and markets may believe in one scenario and the next day, in another. At the same time, new letters are being adopted to illustrate economic and market developments.

With a prolonged crisis, V-shaped scenarios for economic recovery will, at best, be transformed into U-shaped projections, even if a miracle were to take place. If the crisis becomes protracted, the most probable scenario is a W-shaped development in the choppy seas of the virus and the efforts to stimulate the economy. The letter W describing the Baseline Scenario could sway either way in between pessimism and optimism. Nobody wants to believe in an L-shaped curve of a depression. The world can do better. The actions taken by governments and central banks will have an impact, and private enterprises will see us through.


The writer is VER's CEO Timo Löyttyniemi.

TLö blogi 2020.jpg


Recent posts

2024-01-26 at 11:55
2023-12-14 at 11:02
2023-11-24 at 11:18


acceleration active investing added value AI alternative investments asset classes austerity measures authoritarian governments baby boom baseline capitalism carbon border tax carbon emissions carbon footprint carbon intensity carbon neutrality carbon risk carbon tax carbon-neutral economy carbon-neutrality central banks circular economy climate change climate commitments climate crisis CO2 emissions collateral commercial paper market commodities concentrated markets contingency plan contrarian corona crisis coronavirus coronavirus crisis countermeasures covid crisis covid economy crises crisis crypto currencies currencies debt burden debt structures decision-making democracy demographic trends demography dependency ratio depression derivatives development digital money digitalisation dilution disease monitoring system diversification ECB economic competition economic development economic growth economic policy economic system economy effective treatment electricity exchanges emergency measures employment figures energy export energy exports energy imports energy prices energy war environmental policy equity market equity markets escalation ESG exchange rates expected returns external borrowing FAAMG Fed financial crisis financial market financial markets financial stability fiscal policy fixed income investments fixed-income investments forecasting fossil fuels free trade funding ratio geopolitics global trade globalisation globalization government debt government finances green technology green transition growth healthcare systems hedge funds illiquid assets increase in prices indebtedness index investing index weighting indices inflation institutional investor institutional investors interest level interest rate interest rate level interest rates internal market international trade investment beliefs investment environment investment returns investments investments contribution approach level of risk liberalism long-term return low-carbon economy market crash market economy market forces market interest rate market movements market portfolio market rallies market reaction megatrends miracle momentum monetary policy ownership policy pandemic pension investments pension investors pension liability pension promise pension system pension systems planning political decision-making portfolio structure positive side effect predatory traders pre-funding preparedness presidential elections price fall protectionism real estate investments real estate sector recession regulation renewable energy renewable natural resources rescue packages responsibility restrictions returns on investments risk bearer risk level risk management risk profile sanctions scenarios security investments short squeeze sovereign debt spill-over effect stagflation state state ownership stimulation stimulation packages stock market stock markets stock prices stocks strategic allocation strategic autonomy strategy success support measures supportive actions sustainability taxation the leading powers timeframe for liabilities timing totalitarianism transition risk uncertainty virus war war of aggression welfare state